# Cursor vs Github Copilot **URL:** \ **Category:** Discussions\ **Created:** [August 19, 2024, 5:14am UTC](https://forum.cursor.com/t/cursor-vs-github-copilot/7780 "2024-08-19T05:14:25Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 9
**Author:** ![danieliser](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/cursor1/user_avatar/forum.cursor.com/danieliser/32/9547_2.png) [@danieliser](https://forum.cursor.com/u/danieliser)\ **Post date:** [October 24, 2024, 5:59am UTC](https://forum.cursor.com/t/cursor-vs-github-copilot/7780/9 "2024-10-24T05:59:23Z")
Will drop this here, as a current state of comparison from someone who started using Copilot as soon as it was available, paid for it for entire team. We then found SuperMaven which was so fast for tab based completions and used both. Started with Cursor about 2 weeks ago and even just tried Copilot again just now. Comparison isn’t there still Cursor way ahead. > [@Differences with the latest Copilot updates](https://forum.cursor.com/t/differences-with-the-latest-copilot-updates/24429/3): > > I just took a few minutes to try Copliot again. Been a few weeks, nothing substantially new or super useful over Cursor, in fact I immediately found a few things lacking: Couldn’t @Folder, picking #workspace is not very effective either No @Web or pasting of a link to scan sites. The tab feature has gotten a lot better at guessing, but didn’t once offer to jump to another file. I mean whos gonna open the CHANGELOG.md and suggest what to add… Am I expected to do that manual work myself now pssh… --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.cursor.com/t/cursor-vs-github-copilot/7780)._