# Does BugBot use always composer 2.5 fast? **URL:** \ **Category:** Help\ **Tags:** bugbot, composer\ **Created:** [July 15, 2026, 6:24pm UTC](https://forum.cursor.com/t/does-bugbot-use-always-composer-2-5-fast/165820 "2026-07-15T18:24:58Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 7
**Author:** ![deanrie](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/cursor1/user_avatar/forum.cursor.com/deanrie/32/1263_2.png) [@deanrie](https://forum.cursor.com/u/deanrie)\ **Post date:** [July 18, 2026, 9:25am UTC](https://forum.cursor.com/t/does-bugbot-use-always-composer-2-5-fast/165820/7 "2026-07-18T09:25:34Z")
Hey, thanks for coming back with the details. One quick note about your specific request reqId `ffde267d-ff57-4045-9c6e-dd2434044f41`: it actually ran on the regular Composer 2.5 model you selected, not Fast. No Fast premium was applied, so you weren’t charged for Fast. The “composer fast” tag you see in the usage window in your second screenshot is a known display-only bug. The label can show “Fast” even when the non-fast variant actually ran. Same case discussed here: [Why am I seeing Composer 2.5 fast (when Fast is not selected)](https://forum.cursor.com/t/why-am-i-seeing-composer-2-5-fast-when-fast-is-not-selected/165808). There’s no update yet on the ETA label bug. About review behavior in general: the main run uses the model you picked, in your case non-fast Composer 2.5. Sometimes review spins up sub-agents, and in some cases those can run on Composer 2.5 Fast, but that didn’t happen for your request. Everything ran on the main agent without Fast. If there’s any update on this request or the label bug, I’ll reply in the thread. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.cursor.com/t/does-bugbot-use-always-composer-2-5-fast/165820)._