tried to write an addon for something. tried c3.7t several times. no luck. G2.5 Pro could do it in 2-3 trials. great. ps: i am a 0 coder. i only know procedure programming like basic, C etc in old schools.

Im an average programer. When using it in existing projects, I often feel that Claude has superior contextual understanding and provides higher quality code suggestions. This might be because Gemini’s optimization on the cursor side hasn’t been completed yet. However, since there are problems that Claude couldn’t solve but Gemini can, once Gemini’s optimization is complete, I might choose to use it.

think of it in a class of students, there are 100 MCQ. the best student know 90% of the MCQ, sometimes, the 2nd best know 85% and they may not 100% overlap. i.e. some MCQ are correct in both, some MCQ are correct only in 1 of them. then why dont we try to use both? try 1 if fail then use another. better than rely on only 1.

your analogy actually gives me idea, If we’re a whale who can burn tons of money, why not use all the flagship models, then we can choose each prompt :slight_smile: ofc we will burn a lot of resources, but quality is namba wan.

I completely agree with your opinion. However, for everyday use, it’s more convenient to have just one superior model. Moreover, if MoA becomes available on Cursor as well, things would move much faster. the financial aspect is also important.

cursor is here to help. for 20USD, you only have chatgpt plus or claude or gemini? now 20USD for cursor, you got everything.

wtf is MOA? ok. grok3: “MOA” can have different meanings depending on the context, and since you referenced a discussion from the Cursor Community Forum, it’s likely related to something in the realm of AI, coding, or technology. Based on the forum snippet and broader context, the most relevant interpretation here seems to be “Mixture of Agents” (MoA),

I just tried gemini for 2hrs. two of the most frustrating hours of my life that i will never get back. it was beyond idiotic.

[image] Questions about cursor's charging model and model calling strategy (gemini 2.5 pro, claude 3.7, and more) Feature Requests Dear Cursor Team, First, thank you for creating such an excellent AI-powered coding tool. Many developers, including myself, rely on it to boost productivity. However, we are deeply confused and disappointed by recent developments. Google has announced that Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental (with 1,000,000 tokens) is now freely available in Google AI Studio. Yet, Cursor continues to restrict access to the full model—even for paying users—while pushing a paid model that offers an inferior experience …

Yes, MoA stands for Mixture of Agent. With MoA, multiple models are used to obtain more accurate responses. This is possible only because Cursor handles multiple models, and I believe it could become a competitive advantage. However, it requires a lot of money, so it might be difficult under the current pricing structure.

That’s the feeling I have every time I interacted with Gemini. That it’s just plain dumb. That’s why I’m not very inclined to try or even bother to try the new version. I only had the feeling of Gemini being a dumb idiot AI that doesn’t understand anything.

Gemin 2.5 Pro + agent do work better than C3.7t

Discussions

decsters01 (Decsters01) March 31, 2025, 6:36am 9

Topic		Replies	Views
Add Gemini-2.5-pro-exp to cursor Feature Requests	115	26271	June 2, 2025
What's your go-to model in Cursor? A frontend dev's take on Gemini 2.5 Pro vs. Claude 4 vs. GPT-5 Discussions	26	6548	September 30, 2025
How To Optimize Your Usage: The Best AI Models to Use, version 3.0 Guides java	25	6855	February 28, 2026
How To Optimize Your Usage: The Best AI Models to Use, version 2.2 Guides	28	4879	December 9, 2025
How To Optimize Your Usage: The Best AI Models to Use, version 2 Guides	34	7540	August 21, 2025

Gemin 2.5 Pro + agent do work better than C3.7t

Related topics