Gemini 2.5 pro 06-05 has issues with Edit & Reapply

Bug Reports
10

Hi everyone,

I’ve experienced similar issues with the edit_file tool, especially when using Gemini 2.5 pro in the Cursor editor. To address these problems, I’ve summarized a set of specific guidelines that I found very helpful. These rules are tailored for Gemini 2.5 pro and can significantly improve the reliability and predictability of your file edits.

Special edit_file Guide for Gemini 2.5 pro in Cursor

Golden Rule: Treat every edit as a “surgical, precise replacement,” not a “fuzzy adjustment.”

Principle 1: Replace, Don’t Modify

  • Action Guideline: Target the smallest, complete logical block and provide a brand new block to completely replace it.
  • DO:
    • Replace entire lines or whole methods/logical blocks.
    • Example:
      // ... existing code ...
public int CalculateTotalPrice() { /* new, improved logic */ }
// ... existing code ...
  • DON’T:
    • Try to only change part of a line or just rename a method in place.
    • Example:
      // ... existing code ...
CalculateNewTotalPrice() // Only changing the method name—very risky
// ... existing code ...

Principle 2: Anchors Must Be Unique

  • Action Guideline: The context you use as anchors (e.g., // ... existing code ...) must be unique within the file, just like a fingerprint.
  • DO:
    • Include enough surrounding context to ensure uniqueness.
    • Example:
      // ... existing code ...
var result = await _service.GetSpecificData(id);
return View(result); // <--- This context combination is likely unique
// ... existing code ...
  • DON’T:
    • Use generic or potentially repeated code as an anchor (e.g., just a closing bracket).
    • Example:
      // ... existing code ...
} // <--- Highly likely to be a repeated anchor
// ... existing code ...

Principle 3: Code Must Be Complete

  • Action Guideline: The submitted code_edit must be a syntactically correct, logically self-contained unit. Don’t make the model guess.
  • DO:
    • Make sure the code you submit can be copy-pasted into the IDE without syntax errors.
  • DON’T:
    • Submit incomplete statements.
    • Example:
      // ... existing code ...
var user = new User { Name = // <--- Incomplete code
// ... existing code ...

Principle 4: Decompose Complex Tasks

  • Action Guideline: Large refactors = multiple consecutive, simple, and safe small replacements.
  • DO:
    1. First edit_file: Add a new helper method.
    2. Second edit_file: Replace the old logic block with code that calls the new method.
  • DON’T:
    • Define a new method and change all its usages in multiple places within a single edit_file operation.

Principle 5: Instructions Must Accurately Describe

  • Action Guideline: The instructions parameter should be a one-sentence, precise summary of the code_edit.
  • DO:
    • Example: instructions: "I will replace the user validation logic with a call to the new AuthService."
  • DON’T:
    • Use vague instructions like instructions: "Fix bug" or instructions: "Update code" (too broad and not helpful).

Summary:
These guidelines are specifically for Gemini 2.5 pro in the Cursor editor. By following them, I’ve seen a significant improvement in the reliability of edit_file operations. Breaking down complex changes, providing clear and unique context, and making sure each edit is a full, valid code block really helps avoid the common issues mentioned in this thread.

Hope this helps others who are struggling with similar problems using Gemini 2.5 pro in Cursor!

13 Likes