I’m on an Ultra plan and have a SuperGrok Heavy sub.
I find Grok meets most of my needs. About 90% of my usage was Grok/Composer. Only 10% was Fable 5.1.
Last month I used 515,690,892 claude-fable-5-1-thinking-high tokens.
I also used cursor-grok-4.6-high: 748,568,844 tokens, and composer-2.5: 205,851,662 tokens. Those hardly put a dent in my limit.
On SuperGrok Heavy, I did 3,615,450,281 tokens, which is maybe 50% of my limit. I never hit my weekly.
I don’t understand how people can’t use Grok and Composer for what they do.
I’m working on 28 year old software that was orginally a commercial BeOS product. Basically it emulates a PPC processor and runs Mac OS up to 9.0.4. It’s mostly written in C++, C, and Objective-C.
I have added support for Mac OS 9.1.2 and OS X 10.3 by creating a NewWorld device tree (MacRISC2, memory, CPU, chosen, PCI, video, ADB, PMU, NVRAM), a PPC32 MMU. With the Guest Toolbox, 68k emulator, Window Manager, HFS, Disk First Aid, all running as guest code. Also added an ARM64 JIT that walks the PPC32 MMU. The JIT was x86_64 only and was missing from ARM64. It greatly improves performance on M Series Macs.
I did 90% of that with Grok/Composer.
Before it could even begin t had to create disassemblers for the ROM and the files on the ISO and Disk Image in Swift. It wrote an HFS driver for mounting classic filesystems on modern Macs (Apple removed the driver from the kernel). It has dumped devices from QEMU for reference. Wrote tests and automation scripts to verify no regressions in the GUI, mouse, and video driver. Takes screenshots and measures performance improvements. It has dozens of rules it must follow before moving on to the next task.
Right now, it is finding calls that aren’t making it to the JIT and are being emulated by C. It created a histogram, and it is working on the top hits. Millions of C calls are being removed, greatly increasing performance.
If Grok/Composer can do that, I’m sure it can make Web apps.