# Is Cursor using FULL version of R1?

**URL:** <https://forum.cursor.com/t/is-cursor-using-full-version-of-r1/44756>\
**Category:** Discussions\
**Created:** [January 25, 2025, 12:37pm UTC](https://forum.cursor.com/t/is-cursor-using-full-version-of-r1/44756 "2025-01-25T12:37:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dannetstudio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/cursor1/user_avatar/forum.cursor.com/dannetstudio/32/17156_2.png) [@dannetstudio](https://forum.cursor.com/u/dannetstudio)\
**Post date:** [January 25, 2025, 7:18pm UTC](https://forum.cursor.com/t/is-cursor-using-full-version-of-r1/44756/4 "2025-01-25T19:18:58Z")

</div>

But is it already confirmed that Cursor uses the 671B parameters model from Fireworks? Maybe it uses another Distill R1 version, or adjusts the context more aggressively, it would be good to confirm this officially.

User @danperks was going to do this in another post when he gets that answer.

> [@Potential concern with Deepseek R1](https://forum.cursor.com/t/potential-concern-with-deepseek-r1/43913/15):
>
> Not yet, will follow up once I hear back from the team. Yes, it should do!

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.cursor.com/t/is-cursor-using-full-version-of-r1/44756)._