hi, i’m noticing a difference in quality between the responses from the official website and cursor. i seem to be getting better results with R1 when i use the official website compared to cursor, with the same prompts. now this could be due to a variety of reasons, and i don’t want to rush to any …

It’s exactly my question as well. I’ve been experiencing the same quality issues. The one received through my own API is far better than the one Cursor uses. As they mentioned earlier, they’re using Fireworks for that. Maybe they don’t use the full version, which significantly downgrades the quality…

Hey, according to this page, this model has 685B parameters, so yes, it’s the full version: [image] Fireworks - Fastest Inference for Generative AI Use state-of-the-art, open-source LLMs and image models at blazing fast speed, or fine-tune and deploy your own at no additional cost with …

But is it already confirmed that Cursor uses the 671B parameters model from Fireworks? Maybe it uses another Distill R1 version, or adjusts the context more aggressively, it would be good to confirm this officially. User @danperks was going to do this in another post when he gets that answer. …

Is it quantized in any way or is it running in fp8 / bf16?

Is Cursor using FULL version of R1?

Discussions

deanrie (Dean Rie) January 25, 2025, 7:49pm 5

The team confirmed that the model with 671B parameters is used, not the Distill R1 version.

[SOLVED] How to use Deepseek in Cursor?

Topic		Replies	Views
Is Cursor using the full power of DeepSeek R1? Discussions	23	6743	February 8, 2025
Which version of Deepseek R1 does Cursor use? Discussions	2	1176	January 29, 2025
Are deepseek-r1 and deepseek-V3 distilled versions in cursor, and can they reach the official 671B Discussions	1	544	February 11, 2025
Potential concern with Deepseek R1 Discussions	32	7270	February 14, 2025
I asked DeepSeek-R1 about Cursor's pricing model Discussions	12	10395	February 15, 2025

Is Cursor using FULL version of R1?

Related topics