That’s really interesting! I had previously thought about creating an ontology (see here) using JSON schemas to define certain concepts. For example, some aspects of your architecture could be represented as clearly defined schemas that you can reference later. However, I wasn’t systematic enough in my approach back then.
Now I’m wondering if this more dynamic, learning-oriented perspective could extend with more than just a summarization, as @bmadcode suggested. Perhaps it could lead to a more complete consolidation that includes stricter definitions using schemas or something similar. In theory, this would allow the agent to dynamically choose how to use knowledge, while at the same time providing us rigorous validators for free. I believe that some core, “firm” knowledge might really benefit from being represented in this more rigid format.