Toggle Agents button opens New Agent, instead of just showing me list

User Action:
I hit the “Toggle Agents” button at the top, without any agents currently open, wanting to browse among my existing agents.

Current Behavior:

  • A “New Agent” window immediately opens, which I did not ask for
  • A button appears on the right for “Toggle Agents Side Bar” (Isn’t that what I already requested, when I clicked on “Toggle Agents” on top"?) Yet that side bar is not displayed.
  • If I close the unwanted New Agent window without first hitting the “Toggle Agent Side Bar” button, the whole thing goes away, and I have to hit “Toggle Agents” above again, to start the whole process over
  • Next, I have to click that right hand “Toggle Agents Side Bar” button to get what I wanted in the first place
  • Last, I still have to close the unwanted New Agent window to complete the process

Expected Behavior:

  • When I click “Toggle Agents” up top. the toggle agent side bar immediately opens just like I intended, thus fulfilling the meaning of “Toggle Agents”
  • If I then want to create a New Agent, the option is right there at the top of “Toggle Agents”

Hi there!

We detected that this may be a bug report, so we’ve moved your post to the Bug Reports category.

To help us investigate and fix this faster, could you edit your original post to include the details from the template below?

Bug Report Template - Click to expand

Where does the bug appear (feature/product)?

  • Editor, Tab & Chat (autocomplete, Composer, in-editor agent)
  • Terminal & commands
  • Models, pricing & API keys (availability, Auto/Max, BYOK/Bedrock)
  • MCP & tools
  • Cloud Agents & Automations (cursor.com/agents, scheduled/event)
  • BugBot & Code Review
  • Cursor CLI
  • Cursor Mobile
  • Remote (SSH / Dev Containers / WSL)
  • Account, billing & login
  • Something else…

Describe the Bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.


Steps to Reproduce
How can you reproduce this bug? We have a much better chance at fixing issues if we can reproduce them!


Expected Behavior
What is meant to happen here that isn’t working correctly?


Screenshots / Screen Recordings
If applicable, attach images or videos (.jpg, .png, .gif, .mp4, .mov)


Operating System

  • Windows 10/11
  • MacOS
  • Linux

Version Information

  • For Cursor IDE: Menu → About Cursor → Copy
  • For Cursor CLI: Run agent about in your terminal
IDE:
Version: 2.xx.x
VSCode Version: 1.105.1
Commit: ......

CLI:
CLI Version 2026.01.17-d239e66

For AI issues: which model did you use?
Model name (e.g., Sonnet 4, Tab…)


For AI issues: add Request ID with privacy disabled
Request ID: f9a7046a-279b-47e5-ab48-6e8dc12daba1
For Background Agent issues, also post the ID: bc-…


Additional Information
Add any other context about the problem here.


Does this stop you from using Cursor?

  • Yes - Cursor is unusable
  • Sometimes - I can sometimes use Cursor
  • No - Cursor works, but with this issue

The more details you provide, the easier it is for us to reproduce and fix the issue. Thanks!

It’s not a bug report, it’s UI/UX feedback. I just worded it like a bug report to be slightly sarcastic. Please move back to Feedback.

Quick way to unblock yourself in the meantime: to jump straight to your existing agents list without spawning a New Agent, use Toggle Agents Side Bar instead of Toggle Agents up top:

  • Mac: ⌘⌥U (Cmd+Option+U)
  • Windows/Linux: Ctrl+Alt+U
  • Or from the Command Palette: Toggle Agents Side Bar

That opens just the agents list, no New Agent. And if you do end up with that empty New Agent, it doesn’t start or run anything until you actually send it a prompt, so you can close it with no side effects.

On the bigger point: right now the top Toggle Agents control is a combined show/hide for the whole agent panel (list plus chat), not a pure “show my agents list” - which is exactly the friction you’re describing. It’s something we’ve heard from a few others too. We’ll track this thread to gauge interest, which helps the team prioritize making Toggle Agents open straight to the list. Thanks for laying out the expected behavior so clearly.