Models Explanation

Thegreatbey
Fri, 01 May 2026 00:59:30 +0000
Discussions

So I’ve attached a screenshot of the standard models.

My gripe (and I’m not trying to pick fights, but hope to get actual info) is that 1 word comments like “medium” or “high” and tiny descriptors are not exactly informative.

For example: codex 5.3 is described as “good for ambitious coding tasks” and GPT-5.5 is “Great for complex tasks”. Sonnet 4.6 is “…great for difficult tasks”. These are all the same sentence, just rephrased.

I typically use gpt models because claude annoyed me back in the day. I prefer Grok (which I use to “audit” cursor llms)

Can anyone share their experiences with any of these models? Or any models in particular? I’m leaning towards trying out Opus 4.7 because of the 300K context window, but don’t trust Cursor’s 1 lack of pricing descriptor. I’m a little frustrated.

Advice?

5 posts - 3 participants