Add Optional QA Model-in-the-Loop to Validate Main Model Outputs

Feature Request
I’d like to propose a feature that introduces a “free model in the loop” functionality, running alongside the paid/commercial model that performs the main task.

The core idea: The free model doesn’t generate the final output, but instead acts as a reviewer, QA layer, or second opinion to validate and improve the quality of what the main model produces.

Potential use cases:

  • Spotting hallucinations or inconsistencies

  • Offering refinements or flagging unclear reasoning

  • Checking for tone, formatting, or safety compliance

How it could work:

  • The user enables a toggle: “Enable QA Review by Free Model”

  • After main model response, the free model either critiques or approves the output

  • Optionally, the free model’s feedback can be auto-applied, or shown as suggestions

  • Optionally give a rating of 1-10 how well the result followed the prompt

Why this matters: In many workflows, especially technical or high-stakes environments, a second check increases trust and reduces manual double-checking. A lightweight free model doing this in the background would be a smart way to raise confidence without significant extra compute cost.

1 Like

Could also ask it to give a rating of 1-10 how well the result followed the prompt

3 Likes

Congrats on moderator @T1000

A QA model to act as a independent reviewer is a smart choice, especially if you can choose which free model as I think it is a good use case for Grok-3-Mini or Deepseek V3.1.

2 Likes

added

Please VOTE :open_mailbox_with_raised_flag:

4 Likes