After rebuilding the same project three times because AI forgot my architecture, I got fed up and built CodeRide with my team.
The problem: AI code assistants lose track of your project between sessions. Every time I start coding with Cursor, Claude, or any AI assistant, I waste time re-explaining my codebase structure, architectural decisions, and coding patterns.
What we built: The project management tool for coding agents using MCP. Upload your project documentation or PRD, and CodeRide breaks it into optimized, fully contextual tasks ready for your AI agent.
How it works:
- Import documentation, PRDs, specs → CodeRide automatically extracts and creates AI-enhanced tasks
- Cursor connects via MCP → Receives persistent project context, prompts, and instructions
- Cursor autonomously fetches tasks → No manual copy-pasting
- Context flows seamlessly → No more rebuilding understanding
Current integrations: Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cline - any MCP client. Install via npm package or simple plug-and-play using Smithery.
Looking for: Beta testers who move fast with AI and work on complex projects where context matters.
What’s in it for you:
-
2 months FREE Pro access (normally €29/month, 400 AI-enhanced tasks)
-
Direct feedback line to our founding team
How to participate:
- Sign up for free at coderide.ai
- Try CodeRide and the MCP integration with Cursor
- Complete our feedback survey and get your promo code with 2 months FREE Pro access (change or cancel anytime)
I’m curious - how do you currently handle context loss when vibe coding? Do you maintain documentation files, copy-paste project summaries, or just accept the repetitive explanations?
Quick survey for testers: We’ll send a 4-minute feedback form after you try the beta.
Anyone interested in testing this out? You can even try our free plan first without any setup. Drop a comment or message me directly.