We’re introducing Cursor Blame, extending traditional git blame with AI attribution, so you can see exactly what was AI-generated vs. human-written.
How it works
Cursor Blame distinguishes between code from Tab completions, agent runs (broken down by model), and human edits.
When reviewing or revisiting code, each line links to a summary of the conversation that led to it, providing context and reasoning for the change.
Cursor Blame also lets you track AI usage patterns across your team’s codebase.
We’d love your feedback!
How could AI attribution help your code review process?
What additional insights would be useful in the blame view?
If you’ve found a bug, please post it in Bug Reports instead, so we can track and address it properly, but also feel free to drop a link to it in this thread for visibility.
read the docs and checked our admin to make sure enabled at enterprise team level, and still not seeing this working. looked at code (the entire file actually) that i know was generated with Cursor and it doesnt show any attribution or anything that I normally dont already see. Certainly nothing like the video shows. Maybe it takes a few hours to activate after enabling the feature? Or…does the feature only work once enabled at the team level form that point on?
How can I turn it off? I know that this is a feature that’s useful if you’re heavily generating AI code, but at this point I’m already pretty used to tracking everything, and with this feature not only it’s not working locally, I also can’t get normal git blame working:
However, there is no conversation summary available, or a link to a thread with more conversation details. When I hover over the blue line on the left (Gemini’s authored code), Agent Conversation is empty.
What could be the cause of this? We’re very interested in this feature to improve our PR review process and get some info on the models and prompts that contributed to the PR, but it’s much less useful without prompt info.
Another note– For this PR I didn’t author any of this code, all changes were made by the Cursor Agent using gemini-2.5-flash. Why am I getting credit for 30% of this PR, any info on how this blame is attributed?
