Cursor AI Experience: Auto Mode, Model Reliability, and Pricing Transparency

Today I noticed that cursor have gated the auto mode so now it never tells me what model it is actually using. Instead I now get this generic message “I’m Auto, an agent router designed by Cursor. I don’t have explicit model identification in my context, so I can’t specify the underlying model.”

Previously I was getting the exact model that the auto mode was choosing.

It seems cursor devs are actively reading the forum (or having AI scan it for issues to patch) and they are fixing whatever I point out here. This is a common pattern I’ve noticed 3 times in the last few weeks.

  1. I uploaded screenshots of the pricing shown for auto mode
  2. I mentioned I was getting claude sonnet for every auto mode
  3. I clarified that I had instructed auto mode to tell me the model and I had a rule to only use certain models

Within 1 day of posting each of the above the exact thing I mentioned was changed. Now either this is just a very unlikely coincidence or the dev team are actively using the forum to plug holes (fine but don’t break the app functionality!)

Auto mode has gone from useful to useless in the span of 1 week and now I have no idea if I’m just getting dumb models or if I should upgrade to ultra or what. Cursor is again a black box and I’m back where I was 2/3 weeks ago feeling frustrated because everything was working perfectly and now it is not - now I’m spinning around with dumb models that can’t follow instruction and I’m wasting time trying to hand hold them.

The same commands and prompts with sonnet work perfectly - I tested it directly in claude. But in auto I’m getting some mystery model that can’t even think to use an mcp or cli to fetch database schema.

If cursor are trying to get me to use claude directly and for me to cancel my cursor sub then they are doing a great job at it.

1 Like

The only thing that frustrates me is that the Auto mode of the Agent in Cursor IDE has a conversation limit. My new cycle started on November 12th, but by November 15th, Cursor popped up a notification saying it couldn’t guarantee that I would be able to use Cursor normally when the next cycle begins (December 12th). I was shocked—honestly, the number of conversations I had with Cursor between November 12th and 15th was really not that many. That’s why I feel Cursor IDE has become too expensive now.

Maybe $60 isn’t a big issue for Americans, but it’s indeed pricey for most Chinese developers. For us, taking home $1,000 a month is already quite good. As for Pro+, I don’t think I’ll subscribe to it. Unless I spend all day writing code and use up all the monthly quota of Cursor, I’ll feel like I’m wasting a lot of money when the billing resets the next month :rofl: .