Discussion of gemini-2.5-pro-05-06

10 Likes

X 上的 Logan Kilpatrick:“Gemini 2.5 Pro just got an upgrade & is now even better at coding, with significant gains in front-end web dev, editing, and transformation. We also fixed a bunch of function calling issues that folks have been reporting, it should now be much more reliable. More details in :thread: https://t.co/HU9VzvDA5a” / X

he new model, “gemini-2.5-pro-preview-05-06” is the direct successor / replacement of the previous version (03-25), if you are using the old model, no change is needed, it should auto route to the new version with the same price and rate limits.

2 Likes

Guys, how do you feel about using it?

Hey, the model continue to appears as gemini-2.5-pro-exp-03-25 in the editor.

Are you sure it has been routed?

2 Likes

Maybe the cursor hasn’t changed its name.

2 Likes

Lets test it this evening then. Also waiting for Aider and other benchmarks (I take LLMArena with a grain of salt)

2 Likes

I’m looking forward to gemini-2.5-pro-preview-05-06

1 Like

I think it is now. I’ve used it. It takes longer to think, maybe up to a minute, but it’s better.

ya I just noticed this as well
it took longer in thiking process

Have u noticed it in regular or pro version?

gemini-2.5-pro-03-25 is the,cursor hasn’t changed its name.

1 Like

:rofl:

8 Likes

So is it gemini-2.5-pro-exp-03-25 in Cursor?

If so, that’s kinda confusing. Since this is not an experimental model, but a preview one.

1 Like


Also I noticed the gemini context has been added , great!

2 Likes

Is there a way to use the old 03-25 ?

Im having a lot of trouble with the new update since today.

Im giving tasks that i written before but it dosent understand the task or want me to do things manually.

1 Like

no, google auto redirect to latest version

1 Like

Yes, and yes it is confusing.

4 Likes

is it me or is thinking taking extra long now.

no hard data, but seems 2-3x longer than before. im waiting 2 min for completion of thinking.

It will also have multiple “thought for X seconds” appearing. Why does this happen?

3 Likes

the same