Feature Request: Dedicated In-App Cursor Assistant Agent

Feature request for product/service

Cursor IDE

Describe the request

The Problem:
Cursor is a powerful and rapidly evolving IDE. Because of this fast pace of development, it can be challenging for users to keep up with the latest features, settings, and best practices. Finding solutions to Cursor-specific issues—such as configuring unique settings, troubleshooting performance problems, or understanding features that have been moved or renamed—often requires digging through forum posts or documentation that may be outdated. This can lead to significant user frustration and wasted time, detracting from the core coding experience.

Proposed Solution:
Introduce a dedicated, specialized AI agent within Cursor whose sole purpose is to act as an expert on the IDE itself. This “Cursor Assistant” would be separate from the general code-generating agents and would be fine-tuned exclusively on a knowledge base of up-to-date, official Cursor information.
This agent would essentially serve as a live, interactive manual and first-line technical support.

Key Capabilities:
• Setup and Configuration: Guide users through setting up their environment correctly (e.g., “How do I stop my personal GitHub account from being added as a co-author?”).
• Feature Discovery: Help users find and understand features, especially those without obvious UI toggles (e.g., “Is there a ‘YOLO mode’ to apply all changes at once? Where can I find it?”).
• Troubleshooting: Provide instant, context-aware advice for common Cursor-specific problems (e.g., “Why is the ‘Cursor Helper (Renderer)’ process using so much CPU? What are the common causes?”).
• Best Practices: Offer tips on how to use Cursor’s unique features most effectively.
• Up-to-Date Knowledge: The agent’s knowledge base must be continuously updated with every new release, ensuring its answers are always current and accurate.
Value Proposition & Justification for a Low/Free Cost Model:
This agent’s role is to solve problems with the product, not to solve coding problems using the product. Therefore, it should be considered a core part of the user experience, like interactive documentation, rather than a premium feature.
• Reduces User Frustration: Provides instant, accurate answers and drastically cuts down the time users spend searching for solutions.
• Lowers Support Load: A powerful self-service tool that would answer many of the repetitive questions currently being asked on the forums and Discord.
• Improves Onboarding and Retention: New users could get up to speed much faster, and existing users would be more likely to discover and utilize the full power of the IDE.

By offering this specialized agent at little to no cost, you would be investing directly in user satisfaction and building a more intuitive, self-sufficient product ecosystem. It would be a powerful statement that you are committed to supporting your users throughout their entire journey with Cursor.

Inspired by Ask Anything

1 Like

yes and waht would be good is for the agents to know what the old agents have said and done the ones you close . also to have them be able to work side by side with the background agent so they done overwrite code from each other etc currently im getting the back ground agent to work on the more fundermentals of my app like getting data i need to process from apis and blockchain and putting prompts to get the local agent to use in files in a folder on gidhub repro and pushinmg it to the repro then wheb the local agent sees it it can do the tasks that the background agent has said. agents need to also create a repro clone for each day and work only on that then if they mess up you can just so back to that(or have them make a zipped full back up that they dont touch.