I wanted an agent to handle routine actions without giving it unlimited authority.
AskGrokWallet evaluates each proposed action against a human-written policy:
- allow — routine action can continue
- ask — pause and wait for a human
- deny — do not execute
Every outcome gets an Ed25519-signed receipt. The receipt records the agent, action, amount, destination, verdict, human
decision and, after settlement, the transaction hash. Receipt events are hash-chained, with the chain head anchored on Ethereum
Sepolia.
The guarded testnet flow now works end to end:
Grok Bot / MCP request → policy → approval inbox → Sepolia vault execution → independently verifiable receipt
Watch the walkthrough and try the no-signup demo:
Verify an anchored example yourself:
I’m looking for five Grok Bot or Cursor builders to test the MCP workflow. The feedback I need is not “looks cool,” but:
- Which real action would you put behind this gate?
- What context would be missing when you approve it?
- Which part of the receipt would you not trust?
- Where does the MCP workflow become confusing or cumbersome?
Important limitation: this is an unaudited developer preview. The guarded end-to-end settlement has been exercised on Ethereum
Sepolia with mock assets; it has not protected production funds.