Idea: Ask your paying users what they want before the next pricing move

Discussions
1

Hey Cursor team :waving_hand:

First of all, thanks for building such a powerful tool. It’s clearly become a key part of many devs’ daily stack (mine included).

That said, with all the recent pricing/plan changes, I wanted to suggest something simple that could go a long way in rebuilding trust and alignment with your paying users:

:backhand_index_pointing_right: Send out a short survey to your active customers.
Not just asking if they like the new plans, but asking what they’d want to see moving forward.

Here’s what that could cover:

Preferred pricing models:

  • flat monthly subscription
  • pay-per-use (tokens / minutes / requests)
  • tiered plans
  • hourly request limits
  • credits with top-up
  • hybrid models

What would make them feel great about sticking with Cursor long-term?

What changes would cause friction or make them rethink their usage?

What features/limits/options are truly non-negotiable in their workflow?

The message it sends is more important than the format:

“We’re listening, and we want to shape the future of Cursor with you — not just roll things out top-down.”

You’ve got something really strong here. A bit more clarity and shared roadmap thinking would make Cursor feel like a long-term partner, not just a product.

Thanks again :folded_hands:

5 Likes
2

Yesterday I created a similar topic like this, and it was hidden by the moderators — what’s going on with Cursor?

3

They changed pricing to be more accurate and fair. And made the mistake of assuming people would understand the difference between unlimited with conditions, and unrestricted. And sadly they were wrong, people didn’t bother to read the little question mark message that clearly stated not every model was limited.
it was very clear only auto was truly unlimited and unrestricted.

1 Like
4

The usage-based model isn’t cheaper-it’s a profit machine. That $20 “subscription” is just bait. When you break it down per user, you’re actually paying way more. They’re raking in massive profits off the illusion of value. We’re not idiots-at least I’m not. I’m blunt, I know how business works, and this reeks of anti-consumer exploitation.

5

And now there’s a $200 “Ultra” plan? Looks like the goal is to bleed users dry or push everyone toward the most expensive tier. Maybe that scares some into paying-but not me. I’m not buying into this BS. I see right through it.

6

This topic has also been hidden from the list. :rofl: