Multi-Identity Claude Collaborative Coding

Discussion
1

Feature Description:

Utilize three Claude instances, each playing the roles of a product manager, a feature developer, and a UI designer, to collaboratively complete code writing tasks.

Role Assignment:

Claude 1 - Product Manager:

Analyze product requirements, determine the feature list, and establish the UI design framework.

Assign tasks to Claude 2 and Claude 3.

Receive debugging results and adjust task instructions as needed.

Option to pay more for faster response times to enhance coding efficiency.

Claude 2 - Feature Developer:

Write product feature code based on the product manager’s instructions.

Claude 3 - UI Designer:

Design and implement the product user interface based on the product manager’s instructions.

Workflow:

The product manager (Claude 1) analyzes requirements, formulates a plan, and assigns tasks to the feature developer (Claude 2) and the UI designer (Claude 3).

Claude 2 and Claude 3 complete their respective tasks and submit the code.

The user is responsible for debugging the code and providing feedback to the product manager (Claude 1).

The product manager (Claude 1) adjusts task instructions based on debugging results and reassigns tasks to Claude 2 and Claude 3.

Repeat the above steps until product development is complete.

Advantages:

Efficient Collaboration: Three Claude instances each have their own responsibilities, working together to enhance development efficiency.

High Automation: The product manager can automatically assign tasks and adjust instructions based on debugging results, reducing the need for manual intervention.

Increased Engagement: Gamify the coding process to add fun and increase developer participation.

Future Prospects:

Consider introducing more Claude instances to play roles such as testers and document writers, further automating the development process.

Develop a visual interface to allow users to easily view task progress, debugging results, and other information.

Explore applying this collaborative model to other fields, such as writing and design.

2 Likes
2

One man’s company. :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:

2 Likes
3

What do you think? Please share your thoughts.

4

This may not be helpful at all, but I was playing with having Claude respond as the 3 Brothers Karamzov. The code was free, concise and emotionally intelligent. But not very productive. :thinking:

5

Interesting, your concept for a collaborative coding process using three Claude instances is intriguing. I’m curious about the specifics regarding their communication and conflict resolution. For instance:

  • Communication Methodology: What is the best way for the instances to communicate their progress and updates? Do you envision a centralized communication hub or a task management system where all instructions, code submissions, and debugging feedback are logged and tracked in real time?
  • Conflict Resolution: In scenarios where multiple Claude developers propose different approaches to solve a problem, how is consensus reached? Does the system employ a democratic process (e.g., a voting mechanism) or does the product manager (Claude 1) make the final call after evaluating the merits of each approach? Also, what measures are in place to ensure that such conflicts don’t stall progress?

I’m genuinely curious.. :thinking:

6

This isnt really a new concept or something untested. Many tools can set up chains of AI requests like explained with a manager and task related experts.

the communication is automatic as manager makes a request to an task expert and gets response, then hands it of to another if necessary or decides if its done and good.