Proposal for Enhancing Cursor AI with a Web-Based cloud Version

Dear Cursor Development Team,

I hope this message finds you well. First, I would like to express my appreciation for the innovative features that Cursor AI offers. Its capabilities have greatly enhanced productivity and streamlined workflows for many users, and it is clear that Cursor AI holds significant potential. However, I believe there is an exciting opportunity to expand its reach and provide even more value to users: the development of a web-based version of Cursor AI.

Inspiration and Context

This suggestion is inspired by a couple of previous discussions on the Cursor forum, specifically the threads “Pro User Web Version, Anytime Soon?” and “Do You Have a Web Version?”, where users have expressed interest in a web-based version of Cursor. I believe this is a valuable direction to pursue for all plans, as it could offer broad benefits to the entire Cursor community, regardless of their subscription tier.

The Case for a Web-Based Cursor AI:

1. Broader Accessibility:
A web-based platform would allow users to access Cursor AI from any device with an internet connection, eliminating the need for local installations or specific hardware. This feature would be especially beneficial for users who need the flexibility to switch between devices seamlessly, without worrying about installation or compatibility issues. It would also be a game-changer for those less technically inclined who might otherwise hesitate to set up the software locally.

2. Increased Adoption Rates:
Offering Cursor AI via a browser could lower the barrier to entry for users who are hesitant to download software or those with devices that have limited storage capacity. By making the tool accessible directly through a browser, you could attract a wider range of users, including students, professionals, and businesses, all of whom value lightweight, easily accessible tools.

3. Staying Competitive:
Before using Cursor AI, I personally used Replit Agent, which offered the convenience of working in a fully cloud-based environment, eliminating the need for local installations. While it didn’t meet all my requirements, I greatly appreciated the flexibility to code and develop web tools directly in the browser. This feature was incredibly useful, and I believe it would add significant value to Cursor AI as well. It would enable users to code on virtually any device, including iPhones and iPads, making the tool more accessible and versatile.

Additionally, other modern IDEs, such as Gitpod, GitHub Codespaces, and Project IDX, have embraced web-based environments, providing users with similar cloud-first flexibility. Cursor AI could benefit from embracing the option of cloud first flexibility in addition to its local version

Conclusion:

In conclusion, while I truly enjoy using Cursor AI and believe it’s a valuable tool for both developers and non-developers, the introduction of a web-based version could significantly enhance its accessibility, usability, and market reach. Lastly before I conclude my response, I would like to add. If I were to discontinue using Cursor AI, the absence of a web-based version would be the only reason why I would choose to move away from this otherwise excellent tool.

Thank you for allowing me to share the feedback. I look forward to seeing how Cursor AI evolves and continues to support users effectively.

Kind regards,
Zaky

1 Like

vouch