Cursor would be 100x better if LLMs had MCP tools to do semantic searches. If they’re confused, they can get the tooltip of a function/class. If they need to see the source code of a function of class to better understand it, they can go to definition. To get a better understand of a file they can get all the symbols in the file. Semantic searching is way better than grep searching, etc. I’m surprised cursor doesn’t have this ability yet. I created an MCP server that has most of these features but I think it would be way better if the cursor team integrated it directly into cursor. I give cursor full permission to use my source code in their product.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Is there a MCP for getting docs/code of something that cursor doesn't know? | 3 | 157 | March 3, 2025 | |
Cursor Feature Deep Dive | 3 | 982 | September 3, 2024 | |
Cursor MCP resource feature support | 3 | 1157 | April 7, 2025 | |
Is a Local API or MCP Server Available? | 0 | 167 | February 25, 2025 | |
My hot take on Cursor features | 2 | 565 | September 11, 2024 |