Is Composer 2 actually a fine-tune variant of Kimi K2.5? Users have reportedly uncovered evidence of this via the model name in the base OpenAI URL and posted about it on X. See here: https://x.com/fynnso/status/2034706304875602030?s=46
Can you confirm/deny? If the answer is “yes,” why didn’t Cursor/Anysphere note this in the release blog and documentation and include the Kimi K2.5 naming as required in its modified MIT License? “Our only modification part is that, if the Software (or any derivative works
thereof) is used for any of your commercial products or services that have
more than 100 million monthly active users, or more than 20 million US dollars
(or equivalent in other currencies) in monthly revenue, you shall prominently
display “Kimi K2.5” on the user interface of such product or service.”