I summarize, then right after the context window is almost full again, without having interacted with the AI or is empty and then full again right after the first interaction. This is a bug I have observed at least since the beginning of this year.
Hi @Hans_Muster Thanks, for returning and sharing your experience here - that is very helpful. We’re working to improve the summarization, but glad to hear that opening a new chat with a fresh context window and referencing the prior chat worked out well - that’s a great option and thanks for returning to share your experience.
This is not a solution. The /summarize feature is still broken. I don’t want to be creating new chats from scratch 5-10 times on a long conversation, trying to refer the correct previous conversation, and hope it does not pick an older chat in this sequence.
Currently, I am having to workaround this by manually renaming each new chat and adding a serial number to it to keep track of the conversation, and is super painful. This makes cursor super hard to use for anything non-trivial.
I am not asking for an improvement to summarization here. But the /summarize feature appears to be a no-op with no change in context at all. Just that the UI does not show how full the context window is right after you do a /summarize, and it starts showing the original fullness + new contents from the new message right after. Hopefully it’s a silly bug that’s easy to fix.
Thanks Hans, appreciate the workaround. But I really would like to be able to avoid the overhead of opening multiple “sequential” chats/agents (the list of chat/agents gets messy for me, especially if I fork the chat too from some of these “sequential” chats). I decided to bump this thread, since it looked like Cursor team might have thought this was an issue with how well /summarize really summarizes (a hard problem) vs /summarize being a no-op (hopefully a silly bug that’s much easier to fix).
Hi @Govind_Balaji_S and Hans I appreciate you guys following up here.
@Govind_Balaji_S What would really help us investigate this further is a link to a request ID where the summarization isn’t working, but I think your org probably enforces privacy mode. I do see we have one other report of this on Agents view. Are you using agents view or the regular IDE when this summarization does not work as expected?