The usage based pricing column says “Requests” in the header, but shows $ in the units. Either way, the numbers do not make sense, and is also not consistent with that it was before.
Yes the column should be renamed for current plans.
Docs got updated in meantime, with a section on usage based pricing.
Usage based pricing is calculated based on the underlying compute used for the request and is charged based on model API prices.
You can mouse over every charge and see the breakdown in tokens in/out/cache write/cache read. As the charge is not per request but per API usage the request price isnt $0.04. however the request price is shown as per your screenshot.
I’m sorry but I don’t think it’s right that this is billed in this way unless it is properly communicated. Here are some links to problems with the docs.
Thanks for clarifying. The general feedback is that there’s a gap for those who were used to usage based pricing and now the same term means different things in different contexts.
Scroll down to Overview > Switch to Teams Pricing, then Enable Max Mode to see cost in requests per MTok
Take cost in requests / Mtok , divide by 1000 000 and multiply with tokens used (Dashboard > Usage) then multiply by $0.04 (from old calculation) to get to current cost per request logged.
@Yurist_Mospravczentr That depends on what you do, what you model settings are in Chat. It can be correct. There is no issue listed unless you explain it.
@conradkoh I would rather that things get improved than left unchanged and users asking the same questions all over . Not sure if I understand you right, you do not want pricing to be clearer in the docs? hehe
I meant that it is not a “feature” - it is a “bug”. It’s like going to the restaurant, getting billed and they just tell you the total bill but say “please, be patient, we’re working on our docs. pay me now, and come back next time to see the price”.
Not the best analogy, but you can see why this is problematic. No one bills for something if they haven’t made the pricing available for people to see.
The patience should be been exercised by the team before releasing, not an expectation placed on me, seeing that I’m on the receiving end of the bill.
To a large degree - wondering if this is even legal Anyways, not that big a deal for me personally, but the team really needs to figure this out. Thanks for responding quickly tho, appreciate it
Your screenshot is normal, it shows usage included in the plan as ‘-’ (you are not charged additional cost).
Could you create a separate post about your own usage as you may need more information how the plans work and this thread is not about usage within a plan.
. Not sure if I understand you right, you do not want pricing to be clearer in the docs? hehe
Anyways, not that big a deal for me personally, but the team really needs to figure this out. Thanks for responding quickly tho, appreciate it 
