Any way to achieve "old school" accurate autocomplete?

Cursor is great - thank you!

However, before the days of AI autocomplete was different and useful in its own way.

You might type obj. and then tab to autocomplete would offer a list of obj.method1 and obj.method2 etc. Those suggestions would be accurate! i.e. those methods would actually exist.

With AI autocomplete, it might be making up the methods available - which could be useful in the case where you might plan to add them later.

But is there any way to somehow get back to the facts when using Cursor, and only display accurate available methods?

1 Like