I need to know. Haven’t found any benchmarks about code-supernova yet. I was using gpt-5-high, because it was reliable and today I changed to code-supernova MAX mode, it seems to be working well and solving issues like gpt-5, but I need your thoughts. Can’t afford it screw my whole codebase.
supernova will break your codebase. so will gpt5. but with gpt5 the codebase might still be functional after a couple of prompts, cant say the same about supernova
gpt-5 >> grok code fast > supernova
Really? You guys think this? I though code-supernova is pretty good, though. And GPT 5 did not break my codebase. They seems to be working pretty nice for me.
At the moment, I am using code-supernova for more junior tasks and gpt-5-high for most senior tasks.
keep in mind that some models might do better working on specific languages/tasks,
i use svelte / typescript in pretty big project, gpt for me has not been so great while supernova so far have been able to produce pretty good output, with bigger tasks i usually need to correct it in few places but overall it works well
Code-supernova is probably some kind of Chinese LLM. Or a smaller companies LLM. It’s tremendously overfit, and has not seen enough training data. It’s not xAI, not anthropic, 100%–this is someone with limited compute.
(it is xAI—trying to be offensive, so they fix it)