Since the new “cursor-fast” model is supposed to be smarter than gpt 3.5, should we use it as the “Reranker” when doing @Codebase requests? Have you done any benchmarks in that regard?
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Empirical) cursor-fast Benchmark results popular coding languages | 0 | 536 | January 22, 2024 | |
Can Reranker use gpt 4o mini? | 21 | 994 | September 13, 2024 | |
We finally know the answer about reranker model change | 0 | 54 | September 7, 2024 | |
What is the difference between 'GPT3.5 model' and 'Cursor-fast model'? | 7 | 1389 | April 8, 2024 | |
New Benchmark shows the new gpt-4-0125-preview is lazier than the previous version | 2 | 1343 | September 4, 2024 |