Hi everyone,
I’d like to propose that Cursor allow us to have the ability to use multiple prompts/“Rules for AI.”
Why?
Sometimes I need a more streamlined approach with specific hints when developing. But when I’m debugging, a lot of the information in the prompt needs to be changed because the developing and debugging instructions can sometimes contradict each other.
Does it really matter, actually?
I often find myself frequently modifying my AI rules when switching contexts, since the prompt for debugging (focusing on error analysis, tracking, logging, testing, and whatnot) differs significantly from my workflow and what I need during feature development (where I might want more high-level architectural guidance and support).
Combining these different needs into a single prompt can sometimes lead to contradictions or inefficiencies. For example, a prompt tailored for debugging might clutter the responses when I’m writing new code, and vice versa. Having multiple prompts could enable seamless transitions between workflows without the need to constantly rewrite or adjust the existing prompt.
And I would ask the community: how do you guys deal with it?
Do you guys use a single prompt and try to make it general enough for all cases, or do you find yourself switching prompts frequently (like I do) depending on the task?
I believe this could streamline our workflows and make Cursor even more effective for different development scenarios. Would love to hear your thoughts and experiences!
Thanks, guys. Awesome community.