Im happy with cursor/ TAB model

I’m happy with using the Cursor app. I mainly use the TAB model, and I hope it will either be further expanded or made significantly smarter. Even now, it’s already very good. I don’t use code generation models very often, as they tend to clutter the code, although they are still useful for simpler tasks.

If a significantly larger context becomes available for TAB, or new features are introduced, I’ll be even more satisfied. Currently, I’m on a yearly plan.

9 Likes

Ditto.

It was the TAB that made me subscribe and I’m happy to keep the $20/mo just for the TAB!

1 Like

Me also, this is the reason why i’m not over use their api pricing because i know what i should do when i need to use AI without vibe code like a braindead then debug and solve the problem from nowhere

Same, just needs to be a little less aggressive in how it suggests changes and lately it’s been suggesting changes that revert back to what was there before I changed it. It can be frustrating when you accidentally use tab and it deletes a function.

I don’t think it’s worth the 20 dollars alone, but it possibly could with some improvements/configurability.