Describe the request
Feature request for product/service
Cursor IDE / Agent (and Cloud Agents)
Describe the request
We’re running serious agent workflows on Cursor (skills, MCP, shell, multi-step investigations). Today the only way to get usable observability is project hooks (beforeSubmitPrompt, afterMCPExecution, afterShellExecution) pushing redacted events into an external system (e.g. Langfuse).
Hooks prove the need, but they’re fragile and incomplete as a platform story.
Problem
- Agent work is mostly invisible outside the chat transcript: ask → MCP/tool/shell hops → outcome
- Each repo must invent its own tracing bus
- Cloud / some runtimes don’t get the same MCP hook coverage
- No first-class session/trace model, redaction policy, or export API
- Debugging “what did the agent actually call?” requires stitching logs ourselves
Request — native observability
- Stable session + turn IDs across prompt → tools → stop
- Structured spans for MCP, shell, Task/subagents (name, duration, status, redacted I/O summaries — not full dumps)
- Opt-in export (webhook / OTLP / API) to Langfuse, Datadog, Honeycomb, etc.
- Privacy controls (PII redaction defaults, allowlists, local-only mode)
- In-product timeline UI of tool/MCP calls per chat
- Parity between IDE Agent and Cloud Agents for the same events
Why it matters
Enterprises won’t run production agent workflows without auditability. Native observability would make Cursor the system of record for agent behavior — not just the IDE — instead of forcing every team to rebuild hooks + external tracing.
Happy to share a concrete observation schema (AGENT / TOOL / RETRIEVER / CHAIN) and pilot feedback.