As a constructive criticism, and it’s something that has been discussed many times in the forum, but I believe Cursor team urgently need to improve the clarity of the changelogs, as competitors do.
Beyond the fact that it’s unclear what exactly changed in version 0.46, the changelog page (Changelog | Cursor - The AI Code Editor) only lists up to version 0.45.13, with a minimal changelog shared with x.12: “UPDATE (0.45.12-13): Update infrastructure improvements.”
However, versions 0.45.14 and 0.45.15 have also been released, yet there’s no mention of them.
Additionally, for example, on the pricing page (Pricing | Cursor - The AI Code Editor), DeepSeek or o3-mini are not even listed. This seems rather outdated and inconsistent.
Even though I recognize the great progress you’re making, the way these updates are communicated is quite confusing. Cline, for instance, provides a basic changelog but clearly explains what has changed in each version—an approach that is far more effective, or even logical and expected.
I strongly suggest reviewing this, as it should be a relatively simple improvement.
I also think that the way in which updates are released, is really confusing and strange, in addition to the changelog not being updated, it is necessary to manually check with different methodologies how to access the latest, or possible latest stable version, instead of it being something simple and unified, just with the Download button…
I try to be constructive, I really like Cursor, I recently paid the annual subscription, but there is really a lot of competition, things and improvements and new alternatives every day, and beyond the real progress of Cursor, the way they are announced or the way the changes are presented makes them look like they are falling behind, even though in practice they are not really.