Heck, Haiku could likely solve many linter errors.
Another thing I find frustrating is I might use less than half of my requests each month, yet to use MAX I have to pay extra vs. have it use my subscription fast requests that would otherwise be ‘wasted.’
I realize that my ‘wasted requests’ are Cursor’s ‘margin’, but still…
It is an extension tool that is light years ahead of both winds… and cursor. It starts with aug… sorry for not mentioning the full name . Cursor mods can be very trigger happy with deleting post or user accounts if u mention competing product. Just do some googling. It support unlimited chats. And unlike cursor that u need to keep creating new chat session. You dont need to worry about that, that tools context awareness is insane. That tool has an agent mode that does TDD out of the box delivering high quality code output. It doesn’t go crazy like cursor agent mode, it sticks to task at hand implements the task and generates unit test as well , so it won’t commit changes unless all test have passed. This is without any custom rules. My jaw dropped when it fixed a bug cursor couldnt fix after 20 tries.
ah ok , i think we are using the same one, lets not talk about it haha , gonna get banned. You’re right the context aware is crazy i literally have like a repo with 10-20 projects and ■■■■ lots of files since ancient time, it could find the file for me lol. I think if people start flooding there , they probably will have to start nerfing it too
Huhuhu , smart man. Now just so u know go to the discord now , they have an agent mode now that is mind boghling, its accuracy and power blows the chat away. Unlike cursor agent mode that is erratic, that one focuses on task doesnt delete code and does tdd out of the box. Its in alpha but works like its in GA state already. Lol
Did anyone notice Cursor just doubled the cost of using Claude 3.7? Each action now takes two points instead of one. WTF guys? Maybe some increase in price it is needed because you have to make a profit, but did you need to double our cost and throw out the new Max 3.7 for a lot of monetization on top of that? With the 200 tool limit, one action could cost you $10.05, with $10 in tool costs alone??
In Max 3.7, it is the same LLM, just a larger context window, which likely gets you more tool calls. It can look at more code at once, and I suppose it could use more compute, but I would think that it is simply a setting in Cursor alone, and you cover the cost with action points.
Please help me understand how you can justify doubling our price and offering a Max when the LLM model itself is no more powerful.
I really don’t want to say this, and I truly love Cursor, but I ask the Cursor team to please try using WindSf just once. Then, please improve Cursor. WindSf never causes situations like this — in Sonet 3.7, editing is never interrupted or left incomplete. It is always completed no matter what.
Not only MAX, but improvements to Sonet 3.7 are also necessary.
I am currently using both Cursor and WindS**f, and still, I remain a passionate fan of Cursor.
It seems that the cursor can earn more by constantly making mistakes. This is a game where one plays both the athlete and the referee. Ever since max was released, it feels like my regular Sonnet 3.7 context window has gotten even shorter, and tool call errors have become more frequent.
With the latest updates, I’ve noticed that the regular Cursor models like 3.5 and 3.7 aren’t performing as well as they used to. On the other hand, MAX is working impressively well. It almost feels like Cursor might be intentionally shifting focus to make MAX stand out by dialing down the performance of the other models. A bit disappointed with the results.
