Title: Grok Bots as always-on workers vs topic threads
Body:
In Claude Cowork I use lots of short threads — one issue per chat — and those threads also become a record I can go back to.
Grok Bots feel more like always-on coworkers than disposable topic threads. Great for ongoing work, but less clear as a place to keep / retrieve focused information.
Is the idea “one Bot per role,” and keep research threads elsewhere? Or is there a better way to keep topic-scoped context in Grok Bot?
Would love feedback on how people are structuring this.
You’ve read it right. Grok Bots are built as always-on teammates with one continuous conversation per Bot, not short disposable threads. The intended pattern is one Bot per clear job (or per long-lived topic), not a single catch-all Bot.
To keep it organized like your Claude short-thread habit:
Hide from sidebar when a topic wraps (right-click the Bot). History, memory, and routines survive; reopen anytime via Show hidden chats or search. Prefer this over delete.
Duplicate a role Bot to fork it for a new scope (copies the profile/skills, not the old transcript).
Search / Cmd+K across Bots is your topic archive; group chats cover topics that need multiple roles.
There isn’t a Claude-style “fresh session list” on one Bot yet - Reset clears that conversation - and it’s something we’re tracking. Curious how others are structuring their rosters too.