It is recommended that you further reduce the model prices. Currently, whether it is your software or model API pricing, you have no advantage compared to original direct providers like ChatGPT and Claude, especially in terms of pricing, where these manufacturers are much more affordable. Furthermore, your software’s token usage is significantly higher than other applications. With such high costs, many users will gradually find it unbearable and choose to switch to the official subscription plans of Claude and ChatGPT. Additionally, I suggest introducing higher-tier plans again; the current Ultra plan is simply not enough for many heavy users, and subscribing to multiple plans with multiple accounts is not a normal solution. I purchased a Pro membership this month to evaluate your software’s usability and the cost-effectiveness of the plans, but currently, I believe that aside from the convenience of using several excellent models simultaneously without managing multiple tedious bills and your well-known reputation, there is no strong competitive edge
Hey, thanks for the detailed feedback on pricing.
This topic is being discussed a lot, and there are a few big threads collecting similar feedback. I’d recommend checking them out and upvoting or adding your thoughts there, it helps the signal reach the team more effectively:
- Pricing Megathread and Q&A main thread with the team involved
- Cursor is expensive
- High Usage Individual Seeking Better Pricing Options this is specifically about your case Ultra isn’t enough for heavy users
- $60 is too limited, $200 is too much — we need a $100 plan request for a middle tier
Token consumption is a separate pain point and it’s discussed here: Why is a simple edit eating 100,000+ tokens? Let’s talk about this If you have concrete examples with a Request ID, it’s best to post them there, it helps with debugging.
I can’t promise any timelines or ETA for pricing changes, but the request for tiers above Ultra for individual users is already on the team’s radar.