Super Bug! MCP Server Timeout Request

Where does the bug appear (feature/product)?

Cursor IDE

Describe the Bug

MCP server request timeout.
When I use AI-interaction tool, there is always a request timeout error after 2 minutes, my AI-interaction tool response always takes longer than 2 minutes, previous versions of Cursor did not have this error.

Steps to Reproduce

Use MCP Server.
When I use AI-interaction tool, there is always a request timeout error after 2 minutes, my AI-interaction tool response always takes longer than 2 minutes, previous versions of Cursor did not have this error.

Expected Behavior

Timeout.
When I use AI-interaction tool, there is always a request timeout error after 2 minutes, my AI-interaction tool response always takes longer than 2 minutes, previous versions of Cursor did not have this error.

Screenshots / Screen Recordings

Operating System

Windows 10/11

Current Cursor Version (Menu → About Cursor → Copy)

Version: 1.5.1 (user setup)
VSCode Version: 1.99.3
Commit: 99e3b1b4d8796e167e72823eadc66ac2d51fd400
Date: 2025-08-21T00:21:08.834Z
Electron: 34.5.8
Chromium: 132.0.6834.210
Node.js: 20.19.1
V8: 13.2.152.41-electron.0
OS: Windows_NT x64 10.0.19045

Additional Information

When I use AI-interaction tool, there is always a request timeout error after 2 minutes, my AI-interaction tool response always takes longer than 2 minutes, previous versions of Cursor did not have this error.

Does this stop you from using Cursor

Yes - Cursor is unusable

In old versions, MCP Server usually timeout around 10 minutes. Why in this version it is only 2 minutes, many of my MCP Servers cannot work because of continuous timeout.

PLease help! @condor @danperks

I even had less than 2 minutes to enter the prompt into the AI-interaction, not enough time for a long message. Why do that?? @danperks

Please help

Hi @DemonVN at this time the timeout is reduced to avoid issues with AI API request caching on certain providers. I will pass your feedback to our team.

1 Like

Please increase the time, it is too short now that there is not enough time for MCP Server to browse the web

I have send this thread to our team but search queries should via MCP should not take two minutes. Is that happening on a public MCP you could share?

We are looking internally at the MCP timeout.

Hey, this looks to not be an error on us, but actually an error with your MCP server itself timing out - the error you see in the screenshot is actually the data coming back from your MCP server.

I’d recommend checking your MCP server to confirm what may be going wrong here!

My AI-interaction tool generates a UI with input to type a message. I only have about 60 seconds to take a photo, read web docs, collect information, attach files/folders, and type a message. How is that enough? At least give me 5 minutes? Is it a violation if the MCP Server takes a long time to respond?

No, I SURE to you that: before upgrading to version 1.5.1, my MCP server could wait up to 10 minutes without timeout. @danperks

I tried redownloading version 1.4.2 and it still held up for 10 minutes, enough for me to do a lot of AI-interaction work, while version 1.5.1 the tool timed out the request for about 60 seconds.

Here, thank you. GitHub - KhaiHuynhVN/MCP-Server_AI-interaction

I have rewritten the source code for this tool so it no longer works as described in github. Because Cursor 1.5.1 timeouts too quickly.

Also MCP in Cursor now supports the elicitation feature of MCP. perhaps that would be better used for this purpose.

I don’t understand, what is this function?

Elicitation is MCP feature to ask user for input.

Can I see a picture using that function? Or a video would be better. Thank you.

1 Like

That tool doesn’t meet my requirements. It doesn’t look like this.

Auto recall, keep alive chat channel

I am not sure how your last screenshot uses elicitation but that MCP feature asks user for input very similar to your previous screenshot. See the linked docs.

1 Like

Ok Elicitation is good. So I have 60 seconds to interact with Elicitation? The problem is that the timeout is too fast. I’m just wondering why you guys set the timeout so short. I have other ways to deal with the fast timeout, but I’m annoyed by this, what’s wrong with MCP Server taking so long to respond?

Could you clarify where the 60 seconds come from? Is that different from other MCP timeouts as you mentioned 2 minutes as timeout.

We are looking into timeout adjustment from our side.