please rollback to 500/month. I can accept pay for high quality model, but pls show the request, thank you!
6 Likes
The new plan should actually allow for more requests as standard in normal Cursor usage, but totally get why you’d want to stay on the more predictable existing plan.
As @CodeWithBehnam states, you can opt out on cursor.com already!
1 Like
What am I missing?
It says unlimited requests.
Request overage is what was costing me on the last pricing plan.
1 Like
It just feels quite strange blindly using credits not knowing how many we have left and how many each model uses.
For example, Sonnet 4 used to be cheaper than 03 at 0.5 tokens. but now are we scrapping the idea of tokens all together? and would this make O3 cheaper than Sonnet 4 as the input and output of 03 is cheaper.
It’s all very confusing. And I get that more information is coming, but it’s odd how it was just released without anyone knowing how it works.
Don’t get me wrong, I think it does sound great, and I’m praying that it works well. I would just love more clarity around usage limits.
4 Likes
(post deleted by author)
Cursor is going to make a very happy user base very angry if they suddenly start getting request rejections and are forced to upgrade…
1 Like
I left the new plan and found that my usage increased from 23 to 114+. I only had 3-4 conversations, and this growth rate is surprising. How does the new plan calculate usage?
1 Like
@danperks If I hit my rate limit, can I continue using usage-based-pricing? With the new Pro plan changes, will MAX still charge per toolcall?
the absolute lack of communication and transparency makes Cursor look extremely shady.. About the opt out - is it true that going back to old pricing means each tool call is counted as a request?
can you list out tangibly what measurably in the “should” column exceeds the predictable plan, given this is an implicit billing change and our money and sets precedence for future tools like Cursor? what actionably is anyone supposed to do at our junction, if you’re going to suggest it to be the evolved and better system? the tone seems to be as such.
I don’t really get it. Says unlimited so that should be fine - yes? Why you’re bothered?
Actually is there any difference between the quality of response? The only difference is the number of requests and tools usage is now unlimited - yes?
No. There is no perceivable change. It says whatever it says. My wallet says different things than the UI. I was hooked onto recurring usage based costs that shut off abruptly. I then made a new account, circumventing usage based charges, because they are insane. What you’re saying, if implemented properly and honestly, yes, would be unlimited. It is not. I ran into slow charges, and saw all the old mechanisms all the same through simple account switching.
Says unlimited so that should be fine - yes
Probably because it is not in reality truly unlimited?
Why have an Ultra plan, if agent uses would be unlimited… And it clearly states it is not unlimited, “Usage limits apply”
So this move is mostly to obscure real limits, calling it “unlimited*” with “*: usage limits” in tiny writing.
2 Likes
How do you offer this much compute is actually an insulting line lol it doesn’t even have explanation and they still used a markdown header and all that space to separate actual useful information from reality lol
they dont offer compute. the provider does. this is a clown show