No offence and i think this is important to raise

I want to raise two issues that I believe are actively damaging customer perception and long-term trust in the platform.

First, the “domain-only” restriction model. From a business and platform-management perspective, I completely understand why some companies require domain-based emails during signup — it can help reduce bots, spam, low-quality signups, and unnecessary noise. That logic makes sense at the registration stage.

What does not make sense is allowing users to register freely with any email provider, only to later restrict support access, communication channels, or account recovery behind domain-only requirements. To customers, this does not come across as a security measure or intelligent filtering system — it comes across as inconsistent, lazy, and dismissive.

Most users are not naïve. People can clearly tell the difference between a genuine operational safeguard and a system designed without consideration for real-world customer experience. Instead of creating confidence, it creates frustration and gives the impression that customer support accessibility was treated as an afterthought.

Second, the subscription and renewal structure.

Restricting users who hit their usage limits mid-cycle, while effectively presenting “upgrade to a far more expensive tier or wait” as the only solution, feels unnecessarily aggressive. From the customer side, it doesn’t feel like a flexible service model — it feels like being cornered.

There is a major difference between offering premium upgrades and engineering pressure points into the user experience. When customers feel trapped rather than supported, resentment builds quickly — especially among power users who are already paying customers and actively using the platform.

The concern here is not simply pricing. It’s perception.

At the moment, some of these systems unintentionally project an image of arrogance toward the customer base — as though users won’t notice the friction or won’t question the logic behind it. They do notice. And over time, these kinds of experiences damage goodwill far more than most companies realise.

I’m saying this because the product itself has value, and decisions like these risk undermining that value unnecessarily.

Hey, thanks for the detailed feedback. Posts like this are really helpful because they show how the product feels from the outside.

Quick notes on both points:

Domain restrictions: I’m not fully sure what you ran into. [email protected] is open for all accounts no matter the domain, and the forum doesn’t gate access by email either. If you had a specific case where support or communication was blocked because of a Gmail domain, send the details like what exactly happened and what message you saw, and we’ll look into it. It shouldn’t work that way.

Pricing structure: Got it. Worth noting there’s a third option between upgrading to the next tier and waiting. On-demand usage. You can enable it in the Dashboard. It tops up usage as you go, without moving you to a higher plan. It’s not perfect for everyone, but it’s the kind of middle-ground flexibility you’re asking for.

On intermediate tiers, that’s a recurring request. There are a couple similar threads: Mid-Tier Plan between Pro and Pro+ Request for a Mid-Tier Plan Between Pro and Pro+ (2× Usage Option) and $100 plan $60 is too limited, $200 is too much — we need a $100 plan. The team sees the signal, but I don’t have any ETA or promises for new individual tiers.

If your decision to cancel isn’t final and you’ve got specific blockers, email [email protected] and we’ll see what we can do.